1031 Exchange Rules: Exchange Requirement

Taxpayers frequently enter into a Section 1031 Exchange instead of a traditional sale to avoid the often substantial capitals gains and recaptured depreciation tax obligation due as the result of gains realized upon the sale of real and personal property held for productive use in a trade, business or for investment. If the transaction meets all the requirements of a Section 1031 Exchange, any tax due on the gains realized as a result of the exchange are deferred. Understanding how a Section 1031 Exchange differs from a traditional sale, as well as a full understanding of the rules required for a transaction to qualify for a 1031 Exchange, is essential to taking advantage of the capital gains deferral offered by the exchange.

A Sale vs. 1031 Exchange

In a traditional sale, a seller sells a property and receives the income from the sale at the time of closing. The seller may then decide to purchase another property at the same time or at a later date, but the transactions are separate and distinct. In a Section 1031 Exchange, a seller must both sell and purchase a replacement property as part of one cohesive plan. The transaction will not qualify for Section 1031 treatment unless a replacement property is either identified or acquired by the 45th calendar day following the original property sale. If identified, the purchase of the replacement property is completed within 180 days of the original sale. The Tax Court summed up the concept in Bezdjian v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1987-140 by stating “if the Taxpayer’s transfer and receipt of property were interdependent parts of an overall plan the result of which was an exchange of like-kind properties, 1031 applies.”

The use of a Qualified Intermediary is another 1031 exchange requirement that is important to understanding how a Section 1031 Exchange works. Because the transaction is an exchange, not an outright sale, the proceeds from the original sale should never actually be available to the seller as is the case in a traditional sale. Instead, the proceeds are held by a Qualified Intermediary to be used for the purchase of the replacement property. Likewise, the deed for the replacement property must be held by the Qualified Intermediary until the exchange has been completed. Using a Qualified Intermediary is found in the safe harbor rules and “will result in a determination that the taxpayer is not in actual or constructive receipt of money or other property for purposes of section 1031,” according to Regulation 1.1031(k)-1(g)(6).

Finally, it is important to understand that Section 1031 is mandatory. As the court held in U.S. v. Vardine, 305 F.2d 60 (1962), “1031 and its predecessor are mandatory, not optional; a taxpayer cannot elect not to use them.” Although in most cases it is in the taxpayer’s best interest to invoke the benefits of a 1031 Exchange, there may be times when a taxpayer may not wish to do so. As the court pointed out, however, Section 1031 is mandatory.

Complimentary Downloads

To learn ten reasons why a 1031 exchange makes sense, download the complimentary eBook by clicking here. To view a library of complimentary 1031 exchange eBooks for individuals, trusts, corporations, franchise owners, ranchers and farmers, timberland owners, lawyers, CPAs, Realtors and escrow and title officers visit the Atlas 1031 Exchange Resource page.



1031 Exchange Rules: Reporting a Like-Kind Exchange

Internal Revenue Service Form 8824, “Like-Kind Exchanges,” is the two-page form to report gain or loss on a 1031 exchange. The form is filed along with the taxpayer’s federal income tax return to support their intent to initiate and secure the 1031 tax deferral for gain or loss from property held for and replaced by property held for productive use in a trade, business or for investment. When exchanging real estate, the title or closing attorney submits a 1099 to the Internal Revenue Service and provides a copy to the taxpayer. The 1099 reflects the gross sales amount received for the real property. Form 8824 represents the taxpayer’s reporting on how those funds were utilized.

Form 8824 Part I

In Part I, information asked on the exchange includes:

  • Description of the relinquished and the replacement property,
  • Date the relinquished property was acquired and transferred to other party,
  • Date the replacement property was formally identified,
  • Date replacement property was received, and
  • Whether or not a related party was involved directly or indirectly through a qualified intermediary with a related party including your spouse, brother or sister, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, or related corporation, S corporation, partnership, trust or estate

Do not report the 1031 exchange on Form 8824 if the exchange was structured to avoid the related party rules; instead report the disposition of the property sold as if the exchange had been a sale.

Form 8824 Part II

If the 1031 exchange was with a related party, the related party’s name, relationship to you, identifying number and address are requested. To understand more about related parties, view

Form 8824 Part III

In Part III, the realized gain or loss, recognized gain and basis of the property sold and acquired are reported. If more than one exchange is completed in the taxable year, Form 8824 should be filed as a summary reflecting the total recognized gain from all the exchanges and the total tax basis for all replacement property. In addition, the taxpayer should include a statement showing individual property information for each exchange. Be sure to review Instruction to Form 8824 for further insight.

Finally, gain from the exchange is reported on Form 4797 for sales of business property or Schedule D for capital assets. Gain received from an installment loan in an exchange is provided on Form 6252. As always, seek the counsel of your CPA to understand specific taxpayer reporting requirements.

Learn ten reasons why a 1031 exchange makes sense by clicking here.

We Can Help 

Atlas 1031 Exchange has been accommodating tax-deferred exchanges of all kinds for more than 17 years. We are fluent in the rules and regulations of IRC Section 1031 and able to help you navigate your exchange.

Contact us today to discuss any questions you may have. Call our office at 1-800-227-1031, email us at info@atlas1031.com, or submit your question through the online form at the top of this page.

1031 Exchange Rules: Related Parties

The Internal Revenue Code Section 1031 was changed to reflect exchanges between related persons in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989. Subsequent additions were made in the early 1990s that further refined related party 1031 exchange transactions. The reason for the regulations was to prohibit basis shifting between related parties. Basis shifting is when a property with a high adjusted basis is exchanged for a property with a low adjusted basis or a strategy of interdependent steps to avoid or diminish federal income taxes.

Related Party Definition

A related party is defined as any family member of the exchangor including:

  • siblings
  • spouse
  • parents
  • lineal descendants
  • grandparents
  • grantor and fiduciary
  • fiduciary and a beneficiary of the same trust
  • executor and beneficiaries of the estate

Other related parties include the exchangor and a corporation or partnership where more than 50 percent in stock value is directly or indirectly owned by or for exchangor, or a corporation and a partnership if the same exchangors own more than 50 percent in outstanding stock value of the corporation and more than 50 percent of the capital or profit interest in the partnership.

Selling to Related Party

The disposition of a property to a related party is permissible even if the related party intends to sell the property it acquired from taxpayer within two years per Private Letter Ruling (PLR) 200709036 and PLR 200712013. The property must be held for two years in exchanges between two-party exchanges between related parties and where related party sells replacement property to taxpayer and related party then completes its own exchange.

There are exceptions to the two year rule permitting the sale and not resulting in a failed exchange including:

  • Disposition of property following the exchangor’s or related person’s death
  • Disposition in a compulsory or involuntary conversion in a Section 1033 given the threat of imminence occurred after the exchange
  • Purpose of disposition is not the avoidance of federal income tax.

Acquiring from a Related Party

The exchangor may acquire the replacement property from a related party given the related party is also initiating a 1031 exchange and not cashing out. Do not misinterpret this as the exchangor exchanging property with an unrelated party, acquiring replacement property from related party and holding for two years. Whenever a related party is involved in a 1031 exchange, the exchange must satisfy the non-tax avoidance motive of whether a low tax basis was shifted into high basis property.

Tax Avoidance of Step Transactions

Planned transactions to circumvent related party rules may be considered a step transaction resulting in the 1031 exchange being disallowed. In Kornfeld v. C.I.R., 10th Circuit 1998, the step transaction doctrine was applied to disallow a related party exchange because the taxpayer engaged in a series of steps in addition to the exchange to turn an expenditure for nondepreciable land into depletable, stepped up basis in oil and gas leases.

On Form 8824, Like-Kind Exchanges, line 7, The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) asks whether the property of the exchange was sold to or acquired from a related party. Form 8824 instructions state that if the taxpayer can present to the satisfaction of the IRS, that tax avoidance was not the primary purpose of the exchange, an explanation should be included when filing the form. Otherwise, do not report the transaction on Form 8824 and consider the 1031 exchange disallowed. Recent related party Tax Court cases to consider include Teruya Brothers, Ltd. & Subsidiaries and Ocmulgee Field, Inc.

We Can Help 

Atlas 1031 Exchange has been accommodating tax-deferred exchanges of all kinds for more than 17 years. We are fluent in the rules and regulations of IRC Section 1031 and able to help you navigate your exchange.

Contact us today to discuss any questions you may have. Call our office at 1-800-227-1031, email us at info@atlas1031.com, or submit your question through the online form at the top of this page.

Selling Farmland or a Ranch: IRC Section 121 and Section 1031

Selling FarmlandWhen selling farmland or a ranch that has both a primary residence and land, it is important to consider the tax consequences of Internal Revenue Code Section 121 and Section 1031. Vacant land can be sold along with a primary residence, utilizing the $250,000 ($500,000 married filing jointly) exclusion given the property was owned and used by the taxpayer as the taxpayer’s primary residence for time totaling two years or more. The capital gain exclusion is available once every two years.

Continue reading

1031 Exchange Rules: Same Taxpayer Requirement

Buying and selling property with a 1031 exchange can be a very lucrative investment when done properly. Simply understanding the market, however, is not enough to ensure turning a profit. An investor must also understand the various tax consequences involved in real estate transactions. In the normal course of business, capital gains taxes are incurred whenever a taxpayer sells property and realizes a gain on the sale. One method that can be used to defer the payment of capital gains taxes is to enter into a Section 1031 Exchange instead of a traditional sale. In essence, a 1031 exchange involves the taxpayer relinquishing one property and acquiring a replacement property of “like-kind” within 180 days of the relinquishment. One of the rules of a 1031 exchange requires the same taxpayer to complete both ends of the exchange. While this may sound simple enough, there are some circumstances where the identity of the “taxpayer” for purposes of the exchange can become complicated.

Same Taxpayer Requirement

A straightforward exchange involving a single taxpayer on both ends of the transaction clearly meets the same taxpayer requirement; however, not all transactions are that straightforward. Spouses, business entities, and trusts all buy and sell property as well. In addition, a taxpayer can die or otherwise become incapacitated in the middle of a 1031 exchange. Likewise, a business entity can change form or structure in the middle of an exchange The Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, has clarified some of these situations as they pertain to a 1031 exchange.

Death of Taxpayer and Spouses

If a taxpayer dies during the completion of a 1031 exchange, the taxpayer’s estate may complete the transaction and still receive the benefit of the exchange. Transactions entered into by a husband and wife sometimes present issues as well. In community property states, for example, a taxpayer may create a barrier to Section 1031 Exchange treatment without realizing it. If, for example, title to the relinquished property was originally held by only one spouse, but the other spouse is included on the title to the replacement property because of the community property laws, the transaction will not be recognized by the IRS as a 1031 exchange. In the eyes of the IRS, the spouse who owned the relinquished property has now gifted half of the replacement property to his or her spouse, meaning that the same taxpayer did not complete both ends of the transaction.

Another issues that sometimes arises with transactions involving an individual or a married couple is when a lender requires the formation of a separate business entity, such as a limited liability company (LLC). Revenue Procedure 2002-69 specifically addresses this issue as it applies to a married couple by treating a husband and wife LLC as a disregarded entity if the couple chooses to treat it as such for federal tax purposes. In practical terms, this means that a single taxpayer LLC, or a husband and wife LLC, may qualify to take title to the replacement property without violating the “same taxpayer” rule.

Grantor Trusts

Trusts create another potential problem. Revocable trusts can relinquish title or take title without a problem in most cases because the property is still legally owned by the grantor, or the individual completing the exchange. An irrevocable trust, however, can create a problem because the property is not legally owned by the grantor once placed in the trust. In order for this scenario to qualify, the trust itself will have to take title to the replacement property as well as relinquish title to the original property.

Corporations

Business entities can participate in a 1031 exchange; however, the exact same entity that relinquishes the property must take title to the replacement property. In Chase v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 874 (1989), a partnership was involved in the exchange of an apartment complex. The complex was originally held by the partnership, but two of partners transferred ownership in contemplation of the sale to them as individuals. The replacement property was then titled in their names as well. Although the partners attempted to structure the transaction in a way that would meet the 1031 exchange requirements, the court held that the substance over form doctrine applied and did not allow Section 1031 treatment. In other private rulings, business entities that have changed hands or structure throughout the exchange process have been found eligible for Section 1031 treatment. The specific facts of the exchange are very important when a business entity changes form or structure during a 1031 exchange transaction when determining eligibility.

To learn more about when a 1031 exchange makes sense, click here for a complimentary eBook on “Ten Reasons Why a 1031 Exchange Makes Sense.”

1031 Exchange and Delaware Statutory Trust

A 1031 Exchange Strategy for Highly-Leveraged Property Owners With Significant Tax Liability

Many commercial property owners find themselves in a situation where their loans are coming due or they need to refinance because their property is not performing sufficiently to cover their existing debt. Unfortunately, they are frequently unable to secure replacement financing due to their very high leverage needs, particularly in today’s challenging lending environment. An example of this would be a property that was purchased for $2,000,000 with a loan of $1,000,000 which has lost $600,000 of its original market value. Now, instead of 50 percent loan to value (LTV), the taxpayer has over 70 percent LTV, a degree of leverage that is not likely available to them in the present lending environment. And the truly gut-wrenching dilemma for the taxpayer is that even if they can negotiate a sale, the resulting tax bill can be disastrous, often as a result of the depreciation that has been taken.

Continue reading